Investigative
and analytical journalists who take on historical issues venture into delicate
territory and often leave open the possibility of historical inaccuracy, thus
weakening their conclusions. As the saying goes, the chain is only as strong as
its weakest link. Linda Kinstler in “Politico” recently presented a primer on
the pitfalls of not doing your homework.
Ms.
Kinstler smeared many individuals. Most were deserving. Certainly, few if any
were to volunteer to clear the reputations of criminals such as Putin and
Yanukovich, notorious historical tyrants such as Czarina Catherine, Stalin or
living oligarchs such as Medvedchuk, Akhmetov many of whom are to blame or who
can defend themselves. However, deceased heroes revered by the great majority
of the people they fought for, deserve advocates and have millions of them
within the Ukrainian nation. I include myself within those millions.
If Bohdan
Khmelnytsky led a bandit army, as Ms. Kinstler states, then so did General George Washington who led
the Continental Army. I would assume that Ms. Kinstler did not much consider
the use of the term. Slurs against groups in general are not helpful in making
a historical point, gratuitous slurs even less so. For Khmelnytsky the
Pereyaslav Agreement was a temporary military alliance necessitated by the war
against the Poles. The Russians had other plans. Sure it was a mistake in
hindsight. It would have been more productive had Ms. Kinstler used Pereyaslav
as an example to show that Russian disregard for international agreements dates
back to at least the 17th century. That would explain Russia's lack
of respect and adherence to Helsinki of 1975, Budapest of 1994, the Ukraine-Russia
Friendship of 1997 and so many other accords, agreements and treaties to which
Russia was a signatory.
On the
subject of Stepan Bandera, Ms. Kinstler was even less informed. The word
terrorism is a popular attention getter,
particularly after 9/11 but most widely misunderstood. Highjacking
planes and flying them into buildings occupied by innocent civilians is
terrorism. Using drones on foreign soil which often, but not intentionally
results in the killing of innocent civilians as well as the intended target is
a form of foreign warfare with collateral damage. Killing those Polish regime
representatives, responsible for the occupation of your homeland on your own
land was a liberation struggle.
Furthermore, if Bandera had any ideas about collaborating with the Nazis
he did not do a very good job or give the option much time. The Nazis invaded
Ukraine on June 22, 1941. By the following day Bandera delivered to the Nazis a
memorandum in which he severely warned Hitler that only an independent Ukraine
suited Ukrainians and that is this was not in Hitler's plans then Germany would
find Ukrainians to be its worst enemy.
In fact The Ukrainian Insurgent Armey (UPA) was formed not as Ms.
Kinstler states “to help create an ethnically pure Ukraine, free of Jews,
Poles, Russians and other minorities”, but to fight the Germans first. Besides
Ukrainians the UPA included many Jews and some Russians. Bandera himself was
interred in a German concentration camp. Two of his brothers were interred in
Auschwitz where they were murdered by Polish guards.
Prime minister
Yatsenyuk and former prime minister and political prisoner Yulia Tymoshenko can
defend themselves. But the attacks against the anti-Communist and anti-Nazi
laws recently signed by Ukraine's President Poroshenko should be refuted.
Ukraine certainly has a right to condemn the past which was more often than not
the result of foreign occupation.
Furthermore, Ukraine certainly has not only the right but the duty to
rehabilitate and honor its veterans, those who fought for its independence. At
the time of signing the four laws, President Poroshenko, sensitive to
concerns, assured everyone including the
international community that he would submit a democratic draft law regarding
consequences for violations of the subject legislation which would eliminate
any conflicts or infringements upon the rights and freedoms enjoyed by
individuals and citizens, particularly in the areas of scientific study and
discourse as well as international relations and dialogue.
There are
plenty to blame for Ukraine's current ruin. However, Khmelnytsky, Bandera,
Tymoshenko and Yatsenyuk certainly do not belong on that list. If Ms. Kinstler
were sincere in her concern for Ukraine's problems she would stop trying to
blame the victims and go after the perpetrators. However, do so with due
diligence, serious research, study and analysis. Without that process, you are
not really helping Ukraine.
May 30,
2015
Askold S. Lozynskyj
The
writer is an attorney at law based in New York and a former president of the
Ukrainian World Congress.
Немає коментарів:
Дописати коментар